Best Type of Wood for Cutting Board: 5 Woods Compared
Quick answer
Best type of wood for cutting board: hard maple, the wood the FDA Food Code names, plus walnut, cherry and teak compared on USDA hardness.
Updated 2026-09-25 · Sources: fda.gov, USDA Wood Handbook, sonderla.com, Wikipedia
Found one? Take a photo to identify it.
Download on the App StoreWhat are the key facts?
- Best all-round wood: Hard (sugar) maple: 1,450 lbf side hardness, fine closed grain (USDA Wood Handbook)
- What the FDA Food Code allows: Hard maple or an equivalently hard, close-grained wood for cutting boards (section 4-101.17)
- Gentler on knives: Black walnut 1,010 lbf, black cherry 950 lbf (USDA)
- Woods to skip: Soft, open-grained or resinous woods; known sensitizers such as cocobolo and other rosewoods
- End grain vs edge grain: End grain is gentler on knives and shows fewer cuts; edge grain costs less (Sonder LA)
- Care: Food-grade mineral oil; no dishwasher, no soaking (Wikipedia)
The best woods for a cutting board
The best type of wood for cutting board use is hard maple, followed by walnut, cherry and teak. A good board wood is hard enough to resist deep scoring, close-grained so juice and food do not sink into open pores, and free of strong resins or irritant dust. The FDA Food Code, the model code FDA publishes for restaurants and other retail food businesses, makes the same choice: section 4-101.17 bans wood as a food-contact surface except hard maple or an equivalently hard, close-grained wood for cutting boards, cutting blocks, bakers' tables and utensils such as rolling pins and salad bowls.
Side hardness at 12% moisture from the USDA Wood Handbook (Table 5-3b) puts numbers on it:
- Hard (sugar) maple - 1,450 lbf. Fine, closed grain and pale colour; the traditional butcher-block wood.
- Black walnut - 1,010 lbf. Softer, so kinder to knife edges; dark colour hides stains.
- Black cherry - 950 lbf. Fine grain, reddish colour that darkens with age.
- Yellow birch - 1,260 lbf. Fine grain similar to maple; Oldenkamp Cabinets calls birch a budget-friendly alternative.
- Teak - imported; Sonder LA lists 1,155 on the Janka scale and notes its natural oils resist moisture. Teak dust is a known sensitizer for some woodworkers (The Wood Database), a concern for the maker more than the cook.
Sonder LA also lists acacia at 1,750 Janka as a durable, low-cost board wood.
Which wood is not good for cutting boards
Rule out a wood if it fails any of the FDA's three tests: hard, close-grained, or suitable for food.
- Soft woods. Pine, cedar and other softwoods score deeply; western redcedar has a side hardness of only 350 lbf (USDA), a quarter of hard maple.
- Open-grained or resinous woods. Large open pores hold moisture and food, and resin can flavour food.
- Irritant woods. The Wood Database lists cocobolo, the Dalbergia rosewoods, western red cedar, black walnut and teak among woods that can act as irritants or sensitizers, meaning reactions grow with exposure to the dust. It notes that very few woods are toxic in themselves and that a food-safe finish reduces but does not remove the risk. If anyone in the household has had a reaction to a wood, choose maple and ask a doctor about the allergy.
- Not wood at all. Sonder LA advises against bamboo boards (a grass that is hard on knives) and glass; Wikipedia notes glass and steel damage knives and glass can chip into food.
Wood vs plastic: what the research says
There is no single healthiest material, and the studies disagree. Wikipedia's summary of the research: one 1994 study found wood more likely to retain bacteria and another 1994 study found the opposite; later work found bacterial populations fell faster on oak and pine than on plastic; and a 2020 study found bacteria survived for less time on wood than on stainless steel, polycarbonate or aluminum. Plastic's advantage is that it can go through a dishwasher and be sanitized with bleach without damage; wood's is that shallow cuts partly close up.
The FDA Food Code's reasoning is practical rather than a verdict: it limits wood because moist foods can make a wood surface deteriorate and become hard to clean. Whatever the material, what matters is a separate board for raw meat, washing with hot soapy water, drying fully, and replacing a board once it is deeply grooved.
End grain, edge grain and care
End-grain boards stand the wood fibres upright, so the knife slips between them; Sonder LA calls them gentler on knives and more durable, while edge-grain boards cost less and weigh less. Either way, Wikipedia's care advice is the standard one: oil with food-grade mineral oil to prevent warping, never put the board in a dishwasher, and do not leave it soaking, which can crack it or promote mildew. Maple and walnut need oiling more often than oily teak (Sonder LA).
Before oiling a used or secondhand board, check what it is made of. WoodLens can name the likely species from a photo of the end grain or face; our hard maple, black walnut and teak pages show each wood up close.
FAQ
What do professional chefs use for cutting boards?
In restaurants, the choice is set partly by the FDA Food Code, which allows wood only if it is hard maple or an equally hard, close-grained wood. Plastic is the other common option, because it can go through a dishwasher and be sanitized with bleach (Wikipedia).
Which wood is not good for cutting boards?
Soft woods such as pine and cedar (western redcedar is only 350 lbf, USDA), open-grained or resinous woods, and irritant woods like cocobolo and other rosewoods. Bamboo and glass boards are hard on knives.
What is the healthiest material for a cutting board?
Studies disagree: some found wood holds fewer surviving bacteria than plastic or steel, others found the opposite. Hard maple meets the FDA Food Code for wood; plastic can be sanitized with bleach. Keep a separate board for raw meat and replace deeply grooved boards.
What does Gordon Ramsay use for cutting boards?
We could not confirm his personal choice from a primary source, so we will not guess. What matters more is the board's wood and care: hard maple or another hard, close-grained wood, oiled and kept out of the dishwasher.
Is maple or walnut better for a cutting board?
Maple is harder (1,450 vs 1,010 lbf, USDA) and is the wood the FDA Food Code names, so it lasts longer. Walnut is softer and easier on knife edges, and its dark colour hides stains. Both need regular oiling.
More in Types of Wood, Wood Joints and Tree ID Guides
- Identify Tree by Leaf: Leaf Shape Chart and 5-Step Key
- Identify Tree by Bark: 6 Bark Types and Example Trees
- Tree Leaf Heart Shaped? 8 Trees That Match and How to Tell
- Wood Grain Identification: Name a Board by Its End Grain
- Types of Hardwood Floors: Species, Grades and Construction
- Durable Hardwood Floors: Hardest Species and Tough Finishes
- Types of Hardwood for Furniture: 10 Woods Compared
- Types of Wood Fences: 5 Woods, 10 Styles and Lifespans
- Different Types of Woodworking: 12 Crafts and Their Woods
- Types of Stain for Wood: Pigment, Dye, Oil, Water, Gel
- Wood Frame Construction: Platform, Balloon and Timber
- Ash Tree Bark Identification: Bark, Leaves, Look-Alikes
Related
Find out what tree that really is.
Start with a single photo.
Found one? Take a photo to identify it.
Sources
- fda.govwww.fda.gov/media/164194/download
- USDA Wood Handbookwww.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr282/chapter_05_fpl_gtr282.pdf
- sonderla.comsonderla.com/blogs/sonder-la-blog/whats-the-best-wood-cutting-board-for-me
- Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cutting_board
- The Wood Databasewww.wood-database.com/wood-articles/wood-allergies-and-toxicity/
- oldenkamp.comwww.oldenkamp.com/choosing-the-right-wood-species-for-your-cabinets-what-really-
Compiled by the WoodLens editorial team
Every fact on this page is taken from the sources listed above; numbers and prices are copied from the source, and prices name the guide or auction and its date. Research and drafting were assisted by AI, and each claim was then checked against the cited sources. Checked 2026-09-25. We do not buy, sell or grade items; the app identifies what you photograph and points you to these references.